Saturday, December 12, 2009

Global Warming

Here's the main body of a letter from Frank de Jong to a newsgroup I belong to.

"Climate change is again at the top of the global agenda. Hopefully this time the nations of the world will take concerted action.

Two points:

1. Conventional wisdom states that addressing climate change will cost huge amounts of money. The climate change defenders say it would be money well spent, while the climate change deniers say it would be a waste of money. But this entire premise is incorrect.

Climate change can and should be addressed at zero cost, by using the tax structure as a policy tool, through tax shifting, i.e. untaxing jobs and business and up-taxing resource use, land values and the privilege of polluting. Green tax shifts are revenue-neutral and cost taxpayers and governments nothing. In fact they benefit the economy by rewarding value-added, labour-intensive, resource-efficient, clean production and punishing ecologically destructive manufacturing and life styles.

2. Switching the source of government revenue from personal incomes and business profits to levies and fees on the use and abuse of the global commons, should become policy whether climate change exists or not. There are multiple benefits to green tax shifting, including more jobs, a more prosperous economy, less sprawl, more walkable neighbourhoods, increased economic viability of local food and clean energy, resource conservation, nature preservation, less poverty, less cancer, heart disease, diabetes and asthma.

These points obliterate the arguments of the climate change deniers by presenting a fiscally responsible, politically attractive market mechanism that will address climate change by dramatically reducing the human impact on the Earth without unfair subsidies or punitive compliance legislation."

I think he has some good ideas here. What do you think?


Poolie said...

But if our world is well, what will the drug companies do?

Anonymous said...

Hello. Great job. I did not expect this on a Wednesday. This is a great story. Thanks!

Anonymous said...

I wish not approve on it. I over nice post. Specially the designation attracted me to read the unscathed story.

Anonymous said...

Opulently I agree but I about the list inform should have more info then it has.

Anonymous said...

all of your blogs are legitimately lousy. i'm sorry. not only aren't you as clever as you seem to think you are -- you're just a bad writer, period. but: this is what truly makes you narrow minded ... versus liberal in any authentic sense: instead of liberally picking on a range of religions ( -- when, by the way, you shouldn't pick on anyone's spiritual beliefs -- these are precious to people, they help people understand life and loss -- the seriousness of which is obviously lost on you -- and your puerile jabs at anyone's belief system make you appear not only very anti-intellectual and petty -- and intolerant, like some historic figures -- caesar, hitler, come to mind -- but they align you with the most provincially-minded right wingers in the world). incidentally it is not lost on anyone that though you claim to mock all religions, you've singled out christianity. why don't you have a go at the sammāsambuddha, you ignorant twat? or don't you know enough about any other world religions ( -- though it's clear you know very little about christianity -- ) to mock those, too?

Mark Wadsworth said...

Dear OP, I think you ought to delete some of the spam that has accumulated.

Apart from that, broadly agreed re tax shifting.

Anonymous said...

Nice dispatch and this fill someone in on helped me alot in my college assignement. Gratefulness you on your information.

Anonymous said...

cognates docking oftentimes migrant garg kkflr correlation gophers lawn caseloads multilingual
lolikneri havaqatsu

Anonymous said...

Opulently I agree but I think the brief should acquire more info then it has.

Blogger said...

You may be eligible for a new solar rebate program.
Click here and find out if you qualify now!