tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3666444343240740887.post2448034991515946849..comments2023-10-31T06:11:34.928-04:00Comments on A Walk Through the Valley of the Shadow: Lame ApologeticsOrneryPesthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10251047948220417739noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3666444343240740887.post-86368911196713485022007-10-31T11:47:00.000-04:002007-10-31T11:47:00.000-04:00Just watched Hitchens versus McGrath, a similarly ...Just watched Hitchens versus McGrath, a similarly lame apologist.<BR/><BR/>Hitchens was coherent and strightforward in his argument. McGrath seemed to waffle on and end it all saying it was a matter of faith.Sean Wrighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14485575602984697926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3666444343240740887.post-23808838398716266952007-10-22T18:25:00.000-04:002007-10-22T18:25:00.000-04:00Now that was jolly good fun, too!Did you see this,...Now that was jolly good fun, too!<BR/><BR/>Did you see <A HREF="http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2007/10/dinesh-dsouza-i.html" REL="nofollow">this</A>, in a related post?Spanish Inquisitorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05261181794832002207noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3666444343240740887.post-37078213406723573682007-10-20T16:38:00.000-04:002007-10-20T16:38:00.000-04:00Yes,It is an amazingly shallow argument he has the...Yes,<BR/>It is an amazingly shallow argument he has there. So there may be limits to our knowledge through reason and observation. That may or may not be true, but it does not follow that theology can fill the gap. That simply employs a more basic fallacy. Non sequitor.Sheldonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03743116454273042629noreply@blogger.com